🔗 Share this article

Ten years after the UK embarked on a rushed public vote that split the nation and triggered turmoil, a caution emerges from beyond the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.

Authorities and electorate sleepwalked into Brexit and the identical might transpire with a national vote on a united Ireland, triggering upheavals for which nobody is prepared.

That is the message from two respected journalists from either side of the Irish border who have joined forces to scrutinise the benefits and drawbacks of Northern Ireland leaving the UK to create a fresh nation with the Republic of Ireland.

Political Institutions Not Ready

Fintan O’Toole and The Northern Ireland editor, have determined that the administrative systems in Ireland and Britain are gravely unready for a potentially fraught and transformative public vote.

"The key takeaway of Brexit has gone unabsorbed, which is that stuff can arise suddenly and can gather momentum very quickly," O’Toole stated. "In my opinion that the institutional structure of our archipelago remains extremely volatile."

Book Publication Aims to Provoke Discussion

The pair have analysed the governmental, financial and societal reasons for any constitutional change in a book, For and Against a United Ireland, published by the Irish Royal Irish Academy.

They seek to stir debate on the issue with a series of lectures that will bring them to Westminster soon.

"What troubles all parties, or must worry everybody, is the Brexit referendum of 2016," said the analyst.

"We must avoid a referendum on a yes-no, ambiguous question whose consequences have not been clarified because then you end up with an extremely split population where people who have lost are resistant to losing and the victorious side don't know quite what it is that they have won."

Constitutional Provision

Under the Good Friday agreement, the Northern Ireland official should call a public vote on Irish unity if it seems probable that a most voters would approve.

Nationalist parties and other pro-unification groups say that moment is approaching, and a non-profit named Ireland’s Future has rallied support, but both governments and pro-UK factions downplay the likelihood, making it uncertain whether or when there could be a national vote.

Insufficient Informed Dialogue

Ideological statements for and against unity has hidden the absence of informed dialogue, noted McBride.

"Many are for or against the concept but the detailed consideration which may surpass that to achieve it has largely not occurred. A lot has occurred in scholarly circles but scarcely any government figures or activists seek to involve themselves with even the basics. As an example, which kind of country might be preferred? Unitary? Federal?"

Publication's Method

In the volume, no writer endorses unity or the status quo. Both composes two essays that strive for objectivity in detailing the case for a united Ireland and the case against, gathering financial and societal data, historical precedents and governmental frameworks.

Discussions range over identity markers, levies, healthcare systems, elderly benefits, sovereign debt obligations and the danger of pro-UK militancy. The objective is to educate and provoke conversation.

"Considerable attention exists in the issue but there hasn't quite been a discussion," commented O’Toole. "Discussion indicates an acceptance of the concept that there might be good arguments on each side."

Parallel Votes

A public vote in Northern Ireland would additionally cause one in the Republic of Ireland, where voters report they prefer unification but oppose greater financial contributions or implementing a alternative symbol to acknowledge pro-UK communities' British identity.

"Authorities in Dublin does need to work out what the proposal from pro-unification movements is aside from just saying: 'We seek a united Ireland and we welcome you'," remarked O’Toole.

Likelihood of Referendum

McBride believes a national vote in his era is probable and that it may take place abruptly. "There might be just a mad or a poor or a incompetent official who says: 'We should proceed and get it out of the way.'"

Both pro-unification advocates and unionists have plausible, legitimate perspectives, he commented. "Somebody will succeed in this matter and the other side will eventually lose but all factions has has valuable insights to acquire from the opposing arguments."

Appeal for Wider Dialogue

Westminster should engage with the discussion, stated O’Toole. "This concerns Britain. It is a UK matter equally as it is an Irish matter."